The examples on this page are illustrative delivery scenarios. The repository does not contain enough owner-approved evidence to present them as completed client engagements with dates, client identities, artifacts or measured outcomes. They show how eComHut would structure common ecommerce and CMS problems; they should not be read as testimonials or verified project claims.
Scenario: catalogue and integration reliability
Situation
A retailer receives product or stock data from another system, but failed rows are difficult to trace and the ecommerce catalogue cannot be reconciled confidently with the source.
Delivery approach
Identify the source of truth, map identifiers and fields, define validation and duplicate behaviour, add failure logging, process representative data outside production and compare source/destination results. Catalogue URLs and customer-facing data are checked after the workflow changes.
Evidence a real case study would need
Owner-approved project period, platform/version, sanitized mapping or log excerpt, specific constraints and an observable result. Until those are available, this remains an example scenario.
Relevant services: database and ecommerce integration and Magento development.
Scenario: Drupal content migration
Situation
A content-led organisation needs to modernize its Drupal implementation without losing important pages, media, navigation or editor workflows.
Delivery approach
Inventory source content and modules, map fields/taxonomy/media, define URL/redirect decisions, migrate representative records, verify editor permissions and compare important source/destination pages before cutover.
Evidence a real case study would need
Owner-approved project period, source/target versions, redacted migration map or screenshots, known constraints and a verified outcome. Without that evidence, this remains illustrative.
Relevant services: Drupal development and migration and web development.
Scenario: Magento technical SEO audit
Situation
A store has category, product and faceted URLs but the team cannot tell which templates or URL rules are causing crawl/indexation noise.
Delivery approach
Crawl representative URL patterns, inspect robots/canonicals/status codes, map internal links and sitemap membership, document findings with acceptance checks and separate template/configuration fixes from content recommendations.
Evidence a real case study would need
A redacted audit excerpt, implementation record and before/after evidence approved for publication. No ranking or traffic improvement should be claimed without that data.
Relevant service: Magento technical SEO.
What would upgrade these into verified case studies?
For each completed engagement, the business should approve the project context, period, platform, work performed, constraints, observable outcome and any redacted artifact or screenshot that can be published. Client names and metrics are optional; verification is not.
Discuss your situation
Send the platform, problem and type of evidence you need when evaluating a potential engagement.
Contact eComHut